#6551: [with patch, needs work] fix ugliness in printing of multivariate
polynomials
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  AlexGhitza   |       Owner:  AlexGhitza                         
     Type:  enhancement  |      Status:  assigned                           
 Priority:  major        |   Milestone:  sage-4.1.1                         
Component:  algebra      |    Keywords:  print latex multivariate polynomial
 Reviewer:               |      Author:                                     
   Merged:               |  
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------

Comment(by davidloeffler):

 Hi Alex,

 I decided to run all doctests just to check that I had rebased the patch
 correctly, but there seems to be some funny business in quaternion
 algebras. This is with the #6500 patches and the rebased patch here,
 applied to 4.1:

 {{{
 sage -t  "devel/sage/sage/algebras/quaternion_algebra_element.py"
 **********************************************************************
 File
 "/home/david/sage-4.1/devel/sage/sage/algebras/quaternion_algebra_element.py",
 line 17:
     sage:
 
sage.algebras.quaternion_algebra_element.unpickle_QuaternionAlgebraElement_generic_v0(*t)
 Expected:
     2/3 + X*i - X^2*j + X^3*k
 Got:
     2/3 + X*i + (-X^2)*j + X^3*k
 **********************************************************************
 }}}
 and
 {{{
 **********************************************************************
 File
 "/home/david/sage-4.1/devel/sage/sage/algebras/quatalg/quaternion_algebra.py",
 line 455:
     sage: QuaternionAlgebra(GF(17)(2),3).random_element()
 Expected:
     11 + 16*i + 4*j + 13*k
 Got:
     11 - i + 4*j + 13*k
 **********************************************************************
 }}}

 This has nothing to do with the rebasing, because I ran these two tests
 again using your original patch and without the #6500 patches and they
 failed in exactly the same way. Any idea what is going on here?

 David

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6551#comment:4>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to