#17814: Make calling a cached method independent of source code inspection
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  SimonKing          |        Owner:
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.6
      Component:  distribution       |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Simon King         |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  
u/SimonKing/make_calling_a_cached_method_independent_of_source_code_inspection| 
 30543e7b283c52cad2fbeb060efe78a74c7b42ba
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by jdemeyer):

 Replying to [comment:33 nbruin]:
 > They could either write it into the docstring (as they already do with
 source file information) or they could put some attributes on their cython
 function objects.
 I think the docstring is the only option: look at the fields of
 [https://docs.python.org/2/c-api/structures.html#c.PyMethodDef
 PyMethodDef]

 Even then, I would propose to use just `*args` and `**kwds` for Cython
 methods, which will surely be faster than messing with the list of
 arguments. In the case where uniquess really matters for Cython methods, a
 wrapper could be added to fix the arguments.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17814#comment:35>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to