#17920: Reimplement IntegerLists using Polyhedron.integral_points()
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jdemeyer | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jeroen Demeyer | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jdemeyer/ticket/17920 | b0a04aa5a4454766ed9802d8e99abcd7fb3e105b
Dependencies: #17937 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
> On the ordering, from the title of the class, the output should be in
lexicographical order. Moreover, since these are `EnumeratedSets`, the
change in the ordering could lead to subtle changes that breaks people's
code.
We can sort it before returning it I guess.
> @vdelecroix It's mostly correct
Jeroen compiled many related bugs in the description of #17548.
> Minimal slowdowns are okay (IMO), but significant slowdowns are
unacceptable.
Significant slowdown can be a problem, that's for sure. If they turn out
to be our only way to have a code which does not return wrong results,
however, we will learn to live with them.
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17920#comment:34>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
