#12179: Binomial of integer (mod n) returns integer
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  scotts             |        Owner:  AlexGhitza
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  needs_work
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.4
      Component:  basic arithmetic   |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  binomial           |    Merged in:
  coefficient modulo sd35            |    Reviewers:  Colton Pauderis,
        Authors:  Sam Scott, Marco   |  Johan Bosman, Marco Streng
  Streng                             |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:                     |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by mstreng):

 * status:  needs_review => needs_work
 * milestone:  sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix => sage-6.4


Old description:

> {{{
> sage: R = Integers(6)
> sage: binomial(R(5), R(2))
> 10
> sage: binomial(R(5), R(2)).parent()
> Integer Ring
> }}}
>
> But {{{binomial(R(5), R(2))}}} is nonsense, both as an element of ZZ and
> as an element of R:
> {{{
> sage: binomial(5, 2)
> 10
> sage: binomial(11, 2)
> 55
> sage: binomial(5, 8)
> 0
> }}}
>
> On input {{{binomial(x, y)}}}, what Sage should do instead is the
> following:
>  * If the parent of y is Zmod(n) rather than ZZ, a `TypeError` should be
> raised.
>  * If factorial(y) is zero or a zero-divisor in the parent of x, a
> `ZeroDivisionError` should be raised. This is automatic if one computes
> binomial(x, y) simply as
>   {{{
>   x.parent()(prod([x-k for k in range(y)]) / factorial(y))
>   }}}
>
> Apply:
>
> * [attachment:12179_new.patch]

New description:

 {{{
 sage: R = Integers(6)
 sage: binomial(R(5), R(2))
 10
 sage: binomial(R(5), R(2)).parent()
 Integer Ring
 }}}

 But {{{binomial(R(5), R(2))}}} is nonsense, both as an element of ZZ and
 as an element of R:
 {{{
 sage: binomial(5, 2)
 10
 sage: binomial(11, 2)
 55
 sage: binomial(5, 8)
 0
 }}}

 On input {{{binomial(x, y)}}}, what Sage should do instead is the
 following:
  * If the parent of y is Zmod(n) rather than ZZ, a `TypeError` should be
 raised.
  * (This seems to be fixed by #17852) If factorial(y) is zero or a zero-
 divisor in the parent of x, a `ZeroDivisionError` should be raised. This
 is automatic if one computes binomial(x, y) simply as
   {{{
   x.parent()(prod([x-k for k in range(y)]) / factorial(y))
   }}}


 Apply:

 * [attachment:12179_new.patch]

--

Comment:

 Replying to [comment:23 vdelecroix]:
 > sage: R = Integers(21)
 > sage: binomial(R(5), R(2))
 > 10

 This should be {{{TypeError}}}, because {{{binomial(x,y)}}} makes no sense
 when y is an element of {{{R}}}. It only makes sense when y is an integer.
 For example, binomial(5, 2) = 10, but binomial(5, 2+21) = 0.

 So of the two points in the ticket description, the work in #17852 fixes
 the second one, but the first one is still open.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12179#comment:24>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to