#17979: Reimplementation of IntegerListsLex
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  aschilling         |        Owner:
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  needs_work
       Priority:  blocker            |    Milestone:  sage-6.6
      Component:  combinatorics      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  days64             |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Bryan Gillespie,   |    Reviewers:
  Anne Schilling, Nicolas M. Thiery  |  Work issues:  support n in an
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  iterable
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  public/ticket/17979                |  6153cf8d39dc23cb41a3d0c2ea66ba5dc3abd2c0
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by jdemeyer):

 Is this still true?
 {{{
     This is a generic low level tool. The interface has been designed
     with efficiency in mind. It is subject to incompatible changes in
     the future. More user friendly interfaces are provided by high
     level tools like :class:`Partitions` or :class:`Compositions`.
 }}}

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17979#comment:35>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to