#17979: Reimplementation of IntegerListsLex
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: aschilling | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: days64 | Merged in:
Authors: Bryan Gillespie, | Reviewers:
Anne Schilling, Nicolas M. Thiery | Work issues: support n in an
Report Upstream: N/A | iterable
Branch: | Commit:
public/ticket/17979 | cb18ced22db714063e744bb907a035b4fe3afa24
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by bgillespie):
Replying to [comment:34 jdemeyer]:
> Why do you want to supporting `floor` and `ceiling` being a number? We
already have `min_part` and `max_part` for that.
The main reason is that `min_part` and `max_part` are redundant in purpose
with `floor` and `ceiling`, so the hope would be to deprecate that usage
at some point. In the current implementation, all of the cases that can
be handled with `min_part` and `max_part` plus `floor` and `ceiling` can
also be handled using `floor` and `ceiling` alone.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17979#comment:68>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
