#18048: Bug in GAP conversion of finite field elements
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  vdelecroix         |        Owner:
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.6
      Component:  finite rings       |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Peter Bruin        |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  u/pbruin/18048-gap_finite_field_conversion|  
61b6cb93796bc96ac72ce5eab6ecc46772335538
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by {'newvalue': u'Peter Bruin', 'oldvalue': ''}):

 * status:  new => needs_review
 * commit:   => 61b6cb93796bc96ac72ce5eab6ecc46772335538
 * branch:   => u/pbruin/18048-gap_finite_field_conversion
 * author:   => Peter Bruin


Comment:

 Notes:
 - Before this patch, it was implicitly assumed that non-prime finite
 fields are defined by Conway polynomials, because this is how GAP
 represents finite fields.  This is now an explicit requirement.
 - Elements of a GAP prime field `Z(p)` are now converted into a Sage
 `FiniteField(p)`, as opposed to `IntegerModRing(p)`.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18048#comment:2>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to