#17979: Reimplementation of IntegerListsLex
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: aschilling | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: days64 | Merged in:
Authors: Bryan Gillespie, | Reviewers:
Anne Schilling, Nicolas M. Thiery | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 56e831a1e2bbde6ccac2b883e69987b743201a37
public/ticket/17979 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by aschilling):
Replying to [comment:140 jdemeyer]:
> Please add also this example:
> {{{
> sage: sage: L = IntegerListsLex(ceiling=[1], min_slope=1, max_slope=1)
> sage: it = iter(L)
> sage: for _ in range(10):
> ....: print next(it)
> }}}
Fixed. The _check_lexicographic_iterable now also catches that this is not
enumeratable under reverse lex order. I added the two tests that you
mentioned.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17979#comment:148>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
