#17979: Reimplementation of IntegerListsLex
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  aschilling         |        Owner:
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  needs_work
       Priority:  blocker            |    Milestone:  sage-6.6
      Component:  combinatorics      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  days64             |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Bryan Gillespie,   |    Reviewers:
  Anne Schilling, Nicolas M. Thiery  |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:                     |  652a6d552c10b95fd3c735094fe105e4081e47ce
  public/ticket/17979                |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by aschilling):

 Replying to [comment:45 jdemeyer]:
 > Replying to [comment:8 nthiery]:
 > > And we will reuse everything we can from your work!
 >
 > The following takes forever, which is a problem that I ''solved'' in
 #17920, so I'm slightly disappointed this doesn't really work:
 > {{{
 > sage: IntegerListsLex(499499, length=1000, min_slope=1).list()
 > }}}

 This example and
 {{{
     sage: IntegerListsLex(10^100, max_length=1).list()
 }}}
 will be optimized in #18055.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17979#comment:154>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to