#17979: Reimplementation of IntegerListsLex
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: aschilling | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: days64 | Merged in:
Authors: Bryan Gillespie, | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen, Jeroen
Anne Schilling, Nicolas M. Thiery | Demeyer
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/ticket/17979 | f73c43fd4423675f9ce279da9bb929a44db31483
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jdemeyer):
I don't like this:
{{{
.. WARNING::
The specifications of this feature are fuzzy, leading to
potentially surprising consequences (see the examples
below). It is recommended not to rely on it, as it may
eventually be discontinued.
}}}
The specifications are not fuzzy. They might be strange, unlogical,
arbitrary, badly chosen but not fuzzy. To make it less fuzzy, you should
document explicitly the fact that the equivalence only works up to
`max_length` in the {{{NOTE}}} about this {{{WARNING}}}.
(to compare: in #17920 I took the convention that `x in L` is equivalent
to `x in L.list()`, so I don't really identify lists with trailing zeros,
I just output the list with the least number of trailing zeros)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17979#comment:189>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
