#17979: Reimplementation of IntegerListsLex
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: aschilling | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: days64 | Merged in:
Authors: Bryan Gillespie, | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen, Jeroen
Anne Schilling, Nicolas M. Thiery | Demeyer
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/ticket/17979 | f73c43fd4423675f9ce279da9bb929a44db31483
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
> I don't like this:
> {{{
> .. WARNING::
>
> The specifications of this feature are fuzzy, leading to
> potentially surprising consequences (see the examples
> below). It is recommended not to rely on it, as it may
> eventually be discontinued.
> }}}
+1 to that. I also fear that this warning may be used later as an
authorization to not document behaviors and to overlook inconsistencies
because it is, after all, 'documented'.
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17979#comment:192>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
