#17979: Reimplementation of IntegerListsLex
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  aschilling         |        Owner:
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  needs_work
       Priority:  blocker            |    Milestone:  sage-6.6
      Component:  combinatorics      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  days64             |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Bryan Gillespie,   |    Reviewers:  Nathann Cohen, Jeroen
  Anne Schilling, Nicolas M. Thiery  |  Demeyer
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  public/ticket/17979                |  4bcf7dc9ee28539f166c14f973f26401ceb39de3
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by nthiery):

 Replying to [comment:180 jdemeyer]:
 > I agree with this comment:
 > {{{
 > .. TODO:: Maybe this should be ``check=False`` instead?
 > }}}
 >
 > The standard terminology for such an option is indeed `check=False` and
 `waiver` appears only in `integer_list.py`.

 The thing is that there really are two different use cases here:

 (1) I know what I am doing, you do not need to check my input.

 (2) I know what I am doing, don't show me again this warning when
     accessing the more tricky features.

 The first use case definitely fits within the usual `check=False`
 terminology. I am not so sure about the second one. In fact, I could
 imagine situations where I would want (2) without (1): "I'll be using
 the tricky features, still double check everything you can".

 But maybe it's not worth the additional API complexity, and everything
 should just fall into `check=False`. Or rename "waiver=..." to
 `warnings=False`. I don't have a strong opinion.

 Cheers,
                               Nicolas

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17979#comment:208>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to