#17979: Reimplementation of IntegerListsLex
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: aschilling | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: days64 | Merged in:
Authors: Bryan Gillespie, | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen, Jeroen
Anne Schilling, Nicolas M. Thiery | Demeyer
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/ticket/17979 | dba4c6233d2af762986501528370c84c1d24736a
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by nthiery):
Replying to [comment:214 jdemeyer]:
> To be honest, I don't think there is much difference between these two.
Suppose hypothetically that we would add two different flags for (1) and
(2), which checks would be controlled by (1) and which by (2)?
Well, I would know, but you are probably right: let's keep it simple
for the user.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17979#comment:235>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
