#18114: Automaton: method to create a transducer out of it
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: dkrenn | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: finite state | Resolution:
machines | Merged in:
Keywords: sd66 | Reviewers: Clemens Heuberger
Authors: Daniel Krenn | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: u/dkrenn/fsm | b6043193834c8ca9d4f678c14508cb54eadf5e9b
/automaton-to-transducer | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by dkrenn):
Replying to [comment:6 cheuberg]:
> I am not convinced that the name of the function is the best choice
because `A.transducer()` might be thought to do the same thing as
`Transducer(A)`, but this is not the case [...]
`A.construct_transducer` ?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18114#comment:10>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
