#6837: Implementation of twisting modular forms by Dirichlet characters
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  ljpk               |        Owner:  craigcitro
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_work
       Priority:  minor              |    Milestone:  sage-6.4
      Component:  modular forms      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  modular form       |    Merged in:
  twist character                    |    Reviewers:
        Authors:  Lloyd Kilford,     |  Work issues:
  Alex Ghitza, Peter Bruin           |       Commit:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  e576ad46ca1427fde0e570371d1c5ef670a863ed
         Branch:                     |     Stopgaps:
  u/pbruin/6837-modular_form_twist   |
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by wuthrich):

 * status:  needs_review => needs_work


Comment:

 I tested this and all test passed. However, I am not sure about the
 implementation. There is only one (rather trivial) test in the
 documentations. So I played around a bit.

 Currently it fails if the form is a {{{NewForm}}} as explained in  #18086
 .

 It also fails if f does not have a neben character:
 {{{
 sage: M = CuspForms(Gamma1(13),4)
 sage: f = M.basis()[13]
 sage: G = DirichletGroup(11)
 sage: chi = G.0
 sage: f.twist(chi)
 }}}

 gives {{{ValueError: Form is not an eigenvector for <2>}}}

 Similarly it fails when the character has values outside the field of
 coefficients of f:

 {{{
 sage: M = CuspForms(Gamma0(37),2)
 sage: f = M.0
 sage: G = DirichletGroup(11)
 sage: chi = G.0
 sage: chi
 Dirichlet character modulo 11 of conductor 11 mapping 2 |--> zeta10
 sage: f.twist(chi)
 }}}

 returns {{{ValueError: No coercion defined}}}.

 Now some of these problems may be due to user choosing bad input. But that
 should be checked in the function or (at the least) be documented. Alas, I
 revert it to needs work.

 However I do thank you for picking up this old ticket and working on it. I
 really would like to see this work in Sage. Thanks for picking up on David
 Loeffler's comments.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/6837#comment:20>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to