#17979: Reimplementation of IntegerListsLex
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: aschilling | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: days64 | Merged in:
Authors: Bryan Gillespie, | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen, Jeroen
Anne Schilling, Nicolas M. Thiery | Demeyer, Travis Scrimshaw
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/ticket/17979 | 0bff4490123fc1366799be4a92d5d5ddfb82a5cc
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jdemeyer):
Replying to [comment:439 ncohen]:
> Now, I agree that this is hard to fix inside of the class. Thus instead
of
> claiming that it is not a bug by adding a line of documentation (which
is why
> you are rewriting the class today) please consider deprecating it.
I completely agree with you in principle. However, I would be against
adding even more changes to other parts of Sage.
As far as I can tell, within the Sage library, `IntegerListsLex` is only
called either with a single number or with `NN` as argument. I agree with
deprecating other arguments (in particular, lists). Deprecating
`IntegerListsLex(NN, ...)` should be done in a follow-up ticket.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17979#comment:440>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
