#5332: Convert MV polynomial constructors in multi_polynomial_ideal.py,
category_object.py, etc
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: mabshoff | Owner: mabshoff
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: trivial | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: documentation | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Marc Mezzarobba | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/mmezzarobba/5332-objgen | c098677d560ea8b2d7e9ee5a12f58cb89193be3a
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by vdelecroix):
All right, let me start again.
1. I agree with all of you on what '''I''' am doing every day to implement
a polynomial ring in Sage. The syntax `R.<x,y> = QQ[]` is compact and
useful.
2. My comment was about newcomers for which the concept of a Python
variable is not necessarily clear (and the confusion with mathematic
variable is automatic). So if you answer, please either be a newcomer or
try to be one. Claiming as Bruno in [comment:13 comment:13] that the
syntax is very simple is a bit of a lie.
Vincent
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/5332#comment:16>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
