#5332: Convert MV polynomial constructors in multi_polynomial_ideal.py,
category_object.py, etc
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: mabshoff | Owner: mabshoff
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: trivial | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: documentation | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Marc Mezzarobba | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/mmezzarobba/5332-objgen | c098677d560ea8b2d7e9ee5a12f58cb89193be3a
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by mmezzarobba):
Replying to [comment:18 vdelecroix]:
> True. But the point is that `sage: my_object?` is also an entry point
for newcomers. I am fine to have the compact syntax in `ideal` or
`elliptic_curves`. But I would avoid it without explanations in
`polynomial_element.pyx` for example.
Then add a paragraph or two to explain the syntax in well-chosen
docstrings...
Do you really see `Polynomial.valuation?` as something people who don't
know how to define basic objects are likely to read?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/5332#comment:19>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
