#18229: Upgrade R to 3.2.0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  charpent           |        Owner:  charpent
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  minor              |    Milestone:  sage-6.7
      Component:  packages:          |   Resolution:
  standard                           |    Merged in:
       Keywords:  r-project          |    Reviewers:
        Authors:                     |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:                     |  ab208a4e69834c786a2f0d4ff5a2626776db4d62
  u/charpent/upgrade_r_to_3_1_3      |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by charpent):

 Important rectifications :

 kcrisman : I was able to get R graphics in the ipython notebook ... but I
 had to %load_ext rmagic before, and work in a %%R cell. This is far from
 obvious after reading the docs. I understand that the ipython is work in
 progress, so this is not (yet) a big problem. But it should eventually be
 documented in a more obvious way. I am beginnig to think that some kind of
 guide to ipython notebook for (repentant ?) Sage notebook users would be
 useful. Maybe ditto for Cloud users (Sagemath cloud is really a different
 beast ...).

 Note that you have to %load_ext rmagic, nor rpy2.ipython (error message :
 ImportError: No module named ipython"). Does this deserve a ticket ?

 fbissey : I tried your way : I moved $SAGE_ROOT/build/pkgs/r/checksums.ini
 out of the way, renamed $SAGE_ROOT/upstream/r-3.2.0.tar.gz to
 $SAGE_ROOT/upstream/R-3.2.0.tar.gz and ran sage -sh sage-fix-pkg-checksums
 : '''neither''' r-3.2.0.tar.gz '''nor''' R-3.2.0.tar.gz appear in the list
 of recomputed checksums (nor does pillow or Pillow, by the way), and
 $SAGE_ROOT/build/pkgs/r/checksums.ini is '''*NOT*''' recreated.

 That was on 6.7beta1 + the present patch. Don't you have other patches ?

 Status : still "needs_review", IMHO.

 HTH,

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18229#comment:10>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to