#18213: A lot of polytopes constructor are broken
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vdelecroix | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.7
Component: geometry | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Vincent Delecroix | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/vdelecroix/18213 | fac3cffdb326dad1d3c61045d1c33044c99b8b32
Dependencies: #18211 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
> You corrected it in 7eb2326
Arggggg... I was looking at the original commit again. I was wondering why
it has been removed `>_<`
> The description is explicit in the doc (commit fac3cff)
Yes yes now it's good!
> There is one example at the end of the doc (from fac3cff)
It happens several times though. Could you add it in the doc of
`base_ring`? You already talk about this field there. It could be
something like "If set to None then it will be `QQ[\phi]`, otherwise it
must be a field that contains it".
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18213#comment:32>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
