#18213: A lot of polytopes constructor are broken
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vdelecroix | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.7
Component: geometry | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Vincent Delecroix | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/vdelecroix/18213 | fac3cffdb326dad1d3c61045d1c33044c99b8b32
Dependencies: #18211 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by vdelecroix):
Replying to [comment:38 ncohen]:
> HMmmmmmmm... I don't exactly know what the isometry group is, but let's
try anyway: what about defining a complete graph on your points, in which
each edge has a color associated to its length. Wouldn't the automorphism
group of that be what you want?
That is a valid definition. But the standard one is the set of orthogonal
matrices that preserve the polyhedron. And it would be nice for
`isometry_group` to be a finite matrix group (and not permutations)!
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18213#comment:40>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
