#18250: G.triangles_count speedup
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
ncohen | Status: needs_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.7
enhancement | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: graph | Reviewers: Vincent Delecroix
theory | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: | fd88c98cfc2fee8d0750cd9b6f88d1d7b8177ed4
Nathann Cohen | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
public/18250 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
See, I am extremely aware of this kind of problems. There is one thousand
different ways of defining stuff, and everybody has his own notion of it,
depending on where you come from. I'm pretty sure that guys from word
theory/automata would think that a triangle is just "a path of length
three that leads you back to where you started" (that corresponds to the
'closed walk' I mentionned above).
I don't want people to believe stuff and end up with something else than
what they had in mind. If two different persons can expect different
result from the same function, I want either none of them or a way to
force them to tell me what exactly they expect.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18250#comment:24>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
