#18289: Revert the changes that #17821 made to graph/
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vbraun | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.7
Component: graph theory | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Volker Braun | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/vbraun/faster_output_for_large_graphs|
ea2ccc2685a477311e113274bdb91937f813c076
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
> The `graph.show()` method does its own thing, though the graph plotting
(wtf is `GraphPlot`) reinvents the wheel in slightly less round ways so
often that I have lost count.
I barely ever touched the file, except to add some doc and handle default
options somewhat correctly. If you think that we can do without it by
using some more general code I really have no objection to make.
About the difference between show/pretty_print/repr, I have to agree with
Karl-Dieter that I find the differences rather thin. Maybe `_rich_repr_`
makes sense for latex output which would look better in the notebook, and
would be impossible to read in the console? For graphs, however, there is
no general way to have a 'readable/enlightenning' plot, so the best is
probably to not represent it graphically unless requested explicitly.
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18289#comment:13>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
