#18289: Revert the changes that #17821 made to graph/
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vbraun | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.7
Component: graph theory | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Volker Braun | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/vbraun/faster_output_for_large_graphs|
e9e7759f34e46e610f9f477e433919893973cf37
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by novoselt):
I think part of the problem is with putting potentially difficult things
into magic methods, which to some extent is fixed for matrices. Rather
than having `_latex_` and `_repr_` produce code for accurate
representations, they should call some other method for doing it in simple
cases and otherwise return a sensible summary about size/structure. Those
who really want to typeset big objects can call those non-magic methods
directly.
As for extra commands for researches vs. extra commands for students (and
teachers who deal with these students!), I'd say that students are at
least as big a target for Sage and the choice is not at all clear. Except
that it tends to be way easier to teach extra commands to researches...
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18289#comment:22>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
