#18289: Revert the changes that #17821 made to graph/
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vbraun | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.7
Component: graph theory | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Volker Braun | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/vbraun/faster_output_for_large_graphs|
e9e7759f34e46e610f9f477e433919893973cf37
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by vbraun):
As I said before, the fact that `graph._latex_()` spews endless tikz code
(that often fails to compile, breaking SageNB) is an unrelated bug. It
should output something like $G_{123}$ that actually can be displayed for
reasonably large graphs.
As for things that are actually on-topic, I suggest we make a new display
preference `plot_graphs` with values `yes`, `no`, `cutoff` (feel free to
suggest other names). Then graphs and other graph-like objects (e.g.
posets) can use that to decide how to show themselves. The commandline
would default to `no`, others to `cutoff`.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18289#comment:52>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
