#18282: Improve the default evaluation method for univariate polynomials
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: mmezzarobba | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.7
Component: commutative | Resolution:
algebra | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers:
Authors: Marc Mezzarobba | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 89671731fdf80e827f11b120a6655659c28c0225
u/mmezzarobba/wip/pol_of_symb | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by nbruin):
Replying to [comment:9 mmezzarobba]:
> Perhaps, yes, but I didn't invent this feature. It has been present for
years, and people use it! There are even examples in the sage library that
rely on `pol(y,x)` working when pol ∈ R[y] where R is ''not'' a polynomial
ring (but another ring with callable elements). So really this ticket is
only about making the implementation understandable, and fixing lots of
corner cases such as those mentioned above.
OK, that seems to be the case indeed. Thanks for cleaning things up a bit.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18282#comment:10>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
