#18317: General documentation about graph data structures
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
ncohen | Status: needs_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.7
enhancement | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: graph | Reviewers:
theory | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: | b7d90367738afb7bfcf2d97701451fccbeebf31f
Nathann Cohen | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
public/18317 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by darij):
Thanks for the edits!
I think you should write "(di)graph", because for many people (such as
myself), digraphs are not graphs.
As for the lack of edge identity, this is a perfectly fine choice, but
should be documented. I don't know where, though -- I am a stranger to
Sage's decision decisions concerning where to document things...
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18317#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
