#18317: General documentation about graph data structures
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
ncohen | Status: needs_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.7
enhancement | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: graph | Reviewers:
theory | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: | b7d90367738afb7bfcf2d97701451fccbeebf31f
Nathann Cohen | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
public/18317 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
Yooooooo !
> I think you should write "(di)graph", because for many people (such as
myself), digraphs are not graphs.
Yesyes. Did you find one that I missed in my last commit?
> As for the lack of edge identity, this is a perfectly fine choice, but
should be documented. I don't know where, though
Hmmm.. Well, I'm used to document a feature or a corner-case, but it's my
first time trying to document something which is not there. And if there
was some place to do that, it is very unlikely that it would also be found
by whoever is interested. In `GenericGraph.edges` perhaphs?
But (please) in another ticket. In this one I hoped to present a clear
view of the graph classes/backends and the data structures behind, so that
we can start working on them seriously.
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18317#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
