#18255: Remove silly LimitedPrecisionConstant class
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: rws | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.7
Component: symbolics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Ralf Stephan | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/rws/remove_silly_limitedprecisionconstant_class|
3e8d5981eb7b787139ab2572e0d9c9e4d6286120
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by kcrisman):
I wonder how many failures it would make - running `TestSuite` would be
instructive, if scary.
> The decimals are certainly not proven correct, as far as I know it's
even an open question whether `brun < 2`.
Interesting! (Do you have a reference? I can only find references to
estimates using twin primes < 10 to the something.)
Are there any (other?) constants known to some number of bits only of
potential interest? I bet there are, but maybe it's not worth keeping the
class around for that.
(Deprecation? Just asking.)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18255#comment:19>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
