#18436: Dimension formulae do not accept Dirichlet characters with certain base
rings
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  pbruin             |        Owner:
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.7
      Component:  modular forms      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  Dirichlet          |    Merged in:
  character dimension formula        |    Reviewers:
        Authors:  Peter Bruin        |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:                     |  a38e707bc54952c8ac5f84353c2d3566b206fb69
  u/pbruin/18436-dimension_formulae  |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Old description:

> In Sage 6.7:
> {{{
> sage: K.<a> = NumberField(x^2 + x + 1)
> sage: G = DirichletGroup(13, base_ring=K)
> sage: Gamma1(13).dimension_cusp_forms(2, G[1])
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> ...
> TypeError: No compatible natural embeddings found for Complex Lazy Field
> and Number Field in a with defining polynomial x^2 + x + 1
> }}}
> This is because `dimension_eis()` tries to convert the character `G[1]`
> into a Dirichlet group with an incompatible base ring.  This was fixed
> for `dimension_cusp_forms()` in #8630; we fix `dimension_eis()` in a
> similar way.

New description:

 In Sage 6.7:
 {{{
 sage: K.<a> = NumberField(x^2 + x + 1)
 sage: G = DirichletGroup(13, base_ring=K)
 sage: Gamma1(13).dimension_modular_forms(2, G[1])
 Traceback (most recent call last):
 ...
 TypeError: No compatible natural embeddings found for Complex Lazy Field
 and Number Field in a with defining polynomial x^2 + x + 1
 }}}
 This is because `dimension_eis()` tries to convert the character `G[1]`
 into a Dirichlet group with an incompatible base ring.  This was fixed for
 `dimension_cusp_forms()` in #8630; we fix `dimension_eis()` in a similar
 way.

--

Comment (by pbruin):

 Replying to [comment:3 chapoton]:
 > Hmm, I have no such bug in sage 6.7 ! was it maybe in a previous version
 of sage ?
 Sorry, I mistakenly put an example in the ticket description that does not
 exhibit the bug.  It should read `dimension_modular_forms` (or
 `dimension_eis`) instead of `dimension_cusp_forms`.  I fixed the
 description.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18436#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to