#17018: Polishing documentation of posets
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jmantysalo | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-6.8
Component: documentation | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jori Mäntysalo | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jmantysalo/polishing_documentation_of_posets|
29a63b926ccbae22a21e3910278cd41ed627d19b
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
Yo !
> Duh, I added `characteristic_polynomial` but did not see
`canonical_label` nor `is_chain_of_poset` which were also missing from
index.
I did it old-style. Wrote the two lists in two files, and compared them.
> I drop `interval` intentionally, because it is just an alias for
`closed_interval`.
Okayokay..
> I'll take a look. But I'm quite sure that there will be more to polish
even after this round.
Yeah sure sure.
> Btw, should "Return '''a''' list of the maximal elements of the poset."
be "Return '''the''' list of the maximal elements of the poset."? Never
sure about this a/an vs. the -thing.
I would expect "the", because that set is unique. The list is not really
unique, as it is ordered, but well.. I expect that everybody expects "the"
there.
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17018#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
