#18447: Implement dual-quasi-Schur basis in NCSF
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: zabrocki | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-6.7
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: ncsf, qsym, | Merged in:
quasiSchur | Reviewers:
Authors: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | d30fc7276c2a0ded086c4f1d18a7a94dec97b57b
public/combinat/zabrocki/ncsf_quasi_schur_basis/18447| Stopgaps:
Dependencies: #18415 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by zabrocki):
I did another timing test on that shows that the improvement is less
impressive if we need to compute a large example from the `dQS` basis to
another basis. I computed
{{{timeit('dQS[2,2,2,2].coproduct()',number=1,repeat=1)}}} and on branch
8cbcc9b it took 53 seconds but on the current branch it takes 52 seconds.
I also checked on f7162f and it took 51 seconds. It might be that we want
to continue to use the to ribbon basis from the QS transition matrices.
I'll see if I can continue to improve the current branch.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18447#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
