#18534: Posets: Adding function from categories to index of functions
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  jmantysalo         |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  minor              |    Milestone:  sage-6.8
      Component:  documentation      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Jori Mäntysalo     |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  u/jmantysalo/posets__adding_function_from_categories_to_index_of_functions|  
b31c216bae73e63b9066778e2a3d569536ca91d2
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by jmantysalo):

 Replying to [comment:3 ncohen]:
 > I believe that you should move those functions from categories files to
 posets files. What you say in the ticket's description is already partly
 wrong: the index of poset function indicates the functions defined in
 `FinitePoset`, but not the functions inherited from more abstract classes:
 I expect that you do not plan to see all poset functions if we ever have
 an index of functions in `lattices.py`?

 Sidenote, we do have index in `lattices.py` now: #18489.

 I asked about moving functions about a year ago. There was some reasons
 for not doing it.

 I think that everyone using lattices will know that a lattice is a poset,
 and so can find the functions. This is totally different in this case:
 plain mathematical knowledge can not reveal at all that some functions are
 available but from another file.

 (There is a real corner case: Student playing with groups may not know
 what is magma or semigroup. In principle there should be no
 `.is_abelian()` (or something like that) directly on groups. It should be
 inherited from magmas. But that might be a problem from documentation
 point of view.)

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18534#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to