#18558: Test all installed packages by default
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
       Reporter:         |        Owner:
  ncohen                 |       Status:  needs_review
           Type:         |    Milestone:  sage-6.8
  enhancement            |   Resolution:
       Priority:  major  |    Merged in:
      Component:         |    Reviewers:
  doctest framework      |  Work issues:
       Keywords:         |       Commit:
        Authors:         |  1ffc3c1a7a909b1d75653f9951da869371cc1039
  Nathann Cohen          |     Stopgaps:
Report Upstream:  N/A    |
         Branch:         |
  u/ncohen/18558         |
   Dependencies:         |
  #18456, #18124         |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------

Comment (by ncohen):

 > ...for good reasons. Merging this ticket as-is will massively decrease
 the usefulness of `make ptest(long)`. That's what I'm worried about.

 My hope is that it will only last momentarily. That whoever sees broken
 doctests will fix them, and that eventually we will fix those bugs instead
 of hiding them.

 The only guys who run doctests (well, except bots) are developers. They
 are assumed to know that a beta release is "experimental" to some extent
 (big red warning on our website, and when you run sage).

 Then there is the advertisement: we should probably wait for a beta0
 release to merge this ticket (it can be reviewed before `:-P`), and when
 we do add a message (on sage-release, and why not in sage-banner)
 explaining a bit what happens. A "fix-optional-doctests" release, so that
 less persons have to wonder why doctests break all of a sudden. And help
 us fix them.

 > I'm not setting this to needs_work because it seems I am alone with this
 opinion, but please think of the consequences of doing this.

 Well, it will be messy at first, I can't deny that. Then it will be less
 and less, until the problems are solved, and also we will not add more to
 the existing ones. Among the consequences, I also see that in the long run
 Sage will be tested better than it is today.

 Nathann

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18558#comment:31>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to