#18447: Implement dual-quasi-Schur basis in NCSF
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: zabrocki | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-6.7
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: ncsf, qsym, | Merged in:
quasiSchur, quasisymmetric | Reviewers: Travis Scrimshaw
Authors: Mike Zabrocki | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 2a8cdf763fc7e40d75a9d821de7062236aa3b54b
public/combinat/zabrocki/ncsf_quasi_schur_basis/18447| Stopgaps:
Dependencies: #18415 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by tscrim):
That's quite a difference. Thanks for checking. If you could add a `# long
time` to line 4770 (the test `s(dQS([2,1,3,1]).to_symmetric_function())`),
and once you've done and are okay with my changes, then you can set this
to a positive review.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18447#comment:25>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
