#18443: Multiplier spectra for projective morphisms
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  gjorgenson         |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_work
       Priority:  minor              |    Milestone:  sage-6.8
      Component:  algebraic          |   Resolution:
  geometry                           |    Merged in:
       Keywords:                     |    Reviewers:  Ben Hutz
        Authors:  Grayson Jorgenson  |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:                     |  71d1123d488ff029e34f50600554aa4fd5be32cd
  u/gjorgenson/ticket/18443          |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:  #18409             |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by gjorgenson):

 I thought getting [1,1] back was messing up the resulting elementary
 symmetric polynomial. For the other {{{x^2 + c}}}, the formal 2-multiplier
 spectra consists of one multiplier and so there is only one elementary
 symmetric polynomial, {{{sigma_{1}^{(2)} = sigma_2 + 4}}}. For {{{x^2 -
 3/4}}}, if we use [1,1] we have an extra multiplier, and
 {{{sigma_{1}^{(2)} = 1+1 = 2}}} when we expect {{{sigma_{1}^{(2)} =
 sigma_2 + 4 = 1}}}.

 I was thinking that it might be better to treat the doubled fixed point as
 a single 2-cycle so that we only get one multiplier. Would that work?

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18443#comment:12>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to