#18003: Implement Fully Packed Loop class
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: kdilks | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: fpl, ncp, days64, | Merged in:
days65, asm, lp, fully packed | Reviewers: Jessica Striker,
loop | Travis Scrimshaw
Authors: James Campbell, | Work issues: create a parent class
Vince Knight, Jessica Striker, | Commit:
Kevin Dilks, Emily Gunawan | 310eb70ad9b93932f34316fd52628af3568d8362
Report Upstream: N/A | Stopgaps:
Branch: |
public/ticket/18003 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by tscrim):
Some notes about your `_element_constructor_`, you don't need to check
`fpl.parent() is self`, as the coercion model has already checked that and
would have returned that. Which is why your test actually works. If you
try to pass in the ASM, your `_element_constructor_` will return `None`. I
think what you should do is copy the implementation from
`__classcall_private__` into `_element_constructor_` and then have
`__classcall_private__` return `FPLs(generator)`. You might also want to
consider passing other types of data to a corresponding SVM in the
`_element_constructor_`.
You can test for a SVM to be the square ice configuration by
`isinstance(SVM, SquareIceModel.Element)`.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18003#comment:35>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
