#18756: Use coerce actions in the category framework
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: SimonKing | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.8
Component: coercion | Resolution:
Keywords: cython, coercion, | Merged in:
actions, categories | Reviewers:
Authors: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | e1111c346a82639bb41161469754d45008117801
u/SimonKing/combinatorial_free_module_cython_coercion| Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by SimonKing):
Replying to [comment:13 SimonKing]:
> The commit that I just pushed moves `CombinatorialFreeModule` to Cython
and lets it use `RingElement` and `_l/rmul_` instead of the current
approach to work around the coercion framework.
To be clear: The aim is to make it `ModuleElement`, not `RingElement`,
after sanitising the `__mul__` methods in `sage.structure.element`.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18756#comment:15>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
