#15375: Extended Affine Weyl Groups SD40
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  bump               |        Owner:  bump
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_work
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.8
      Component:  combinatorics      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  days54, coxeter,   |    Merged in:
  days64, days65                     |    Reviewers:  Dan Bump, Anne
        Authors:  Daniel Bump, Dan   |  Schilling
  Orr, Anne Schilling, Mark          |  Work issues:
  Shimozono, Nicolas Thiery.         |       Commit:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  c36eb6bd081b55b3785294ccff9c496e592707eb
         Branch:                     |     Stopgaps:
  u/mshimo/combinat/extended_affine_weyl_groups-15375|
   Dependencies:  #10963, #14102     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by bump):

 There are currently doctests failures in categories/realizations.py and
 categories/examples/with_realizations.py. These would be fixed by
 correcting the doctest, viz. replacing 'magmas' by 'unital magmas' in the
 failing docutests.

 There is also a doctest failure in misc/dev_tools.py. In comment:96 I
 speculated that this was not caused by this patch, but evidently this was
 wrong. I don't know what caused this doctest to change, but I checked out
 the git commit 05875d563029eb7231d2cae4b434b99e4742fbbf and confirm that
 dev_tools tests pass for that version. Currently this patch is rebased
 atop that commit and I think this proves that it caused the failure. I
 don't know the mechanism but the test in question seems to be pretty
 fragile.

 There is also a build failure patchbot report (as before) that a WARNING
 directive is missing a content block. It looks to me as if Mark's changes
 should have fixed this (the content block is now indented). So I'm puzzled
 by this (unless the build attempt predated Mark's commit. It is date
 stamped 6/20.)

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15375#comment:104>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to