#17392: Make list of built-in normal form games
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: kcrisman | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-6.8
Component: game theory | Resolution:
Keywords: days64 | Merged in:
Authors: Vincent Knight, | Reviewers: Karl-Dieter Crisman,
James Campbell | Travis Scrimshaw
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/vinceknight/catalog_of_games | 31ec186babfd107ca4f1ce62a513a7fe235d557c
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by kcrisman):
I think this solution is fine, though
{{{
+ sage: g = game_theory.normal_form_games.CoordinationGame(A=9,
+ ....: a=6,
+ ....: B=0,
+ ....: b=1,
+ ....: C=2,
+ ....: c=10,
+ ....: D=4,
+ ....: d=11)
}}}
starts looking a little longish. Was there a reason for doing that
uniformly? You may also want to (briefly) mention somewhere convenient
why you're doing this, or perhaps just where the utility dictionary is
`==` to the game, which I wasn't expecting (since it's not a game, just a
random dictionary) but is fine, as far as I care about it.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17392#comment:68>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
