#18824: Add MultiPolynomialIdeal.groebner_basis("libgiac")
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: malb | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.8
Component: interfaces: | Resolution:
optional | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers:
Authors: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: public/giacpyGB | 86bd0a445cee318d3cca0fef87babf4118c910d8
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by frederichan):
The sig_count pb is from giacpy 0.4.8 Pygen __iter__, it could/should? be
fixed in a separate trac?
we can avoid it with:
{{{ return PolynomialSequence(P, tuple(gb_giac), immutable=True)}}}
instead of just gb_giac. I remark time loss with tuple, should we adopt
this?
is there a way to substitute efficiently variables in PolynomialRing (ex:
'i' will give use troubles in giac) if not I will just add some protection
with an error message
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18824#comment:14>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
