#18929: Include igraph library
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  borassi            |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_info
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.8
      Component:  packages:          |   Resolution:
  optional                           |    Merged in:
       Keywords:  igraph library     |    Reviewers:
        Authors:  Michele Borassi    |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:                     |  d6770f994d05bc9443445fbdeedd2a8215806077
  u/borassi/include_igraph_library   |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by ncohen):

 Hello,

 > What do you mean by 'fake' .tar.gz archive?

 Sigh.... After some debugging, it seems that if I click on "source code"
 at this address (http://igraph.org/c/#downloads) I get a file like that:

 {{{
 ~$ file igraph-0.7.1.tar.gz
 igraph-0.7.1.tar.gz: POSIX tar archive
 }}}

 If I copy/paste the url and download it with wget I get a file like that:

 {{{
 ~$ file igraph-0.7.1.tar.gz
 igraph-0.7.1.tar.gz: gzip compressed data, last modified: Tue Apr 22
 19:55:20 2014, max compression, from Unix
 }}}

 Anyway. It works, sorry for the misunderstanding.

 > So I believe it is GPLv2. However, it does not seem to be a problem:
 http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#WhatDoesCompatMean. Moreover,
 also package latte_int is distributed with Sage with GPLv2.

 Yes yes you are right. It would have been a problem for a standard
 package, but of course not for an optional one.

 > In order to solve this problem, I have added a check in the spkg-install
 script, and I had to modify the sage-spkg file to allow an error which
 depends on the user. Do you agree with this modification?

 Oh. Well, I did not want to say that it had to be modified on our side. I
 merely wanted to tell you what had happened and that it had been reported
 upstream. For me it is not a very important problem, and for as long as
 upstream knows and fixes it I do not think that we should care `O_o`

 Nathann

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18929#comment:16>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to