#17693: mutable poset: a data structure for asymptotic expressions
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: dkrenn | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.5
Component: misc | Resolution:
Keywords: asymptotics | Merged in:
Authors: Daniel Krenn | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: u/dkrenn/asy | Commit:
/mutable-poset | 1c6b196bac8386f97bb6234a8442040dd52e8b2d
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by dkrenn):
Replying to [comment:15 jmantysalo]:
> If `union()` does same thing as `disjoint_union()` in posets and in
graphs, please change name accordingly.
No, it does not do the same. Union takes only one instance of equal
elements, whereas disjoint_union makes each one of the equal elements
distinct.
> It seems unnecessary to have `INPUT`-part at all, if the function has no
arguments at all.
The developer guide
http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/coding_basics.html
#documentation-strings
says
An INPUT and an OUTPUT block describing the input/output of the
function. This is not optional.
Therefore skipping one of these blocks seems to be against the rules (and
hopefully helps avoiding the confusion of a missing input block).
> Just my two cents. I would give three, if I would have more time.
Many thanks for all your cents.
Best, Daniel
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17693#comment:16>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
