#17693: mutable poset: a data structure for asymptotic expressions
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: dkrenn | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.5
Component: misc | Resolution:
Keywords: asymptotics | Merged in:
Authors: Daniel Krenn | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: u/dkrenn/asy | Commit:
/mutable-poset | 19fd1556a56a6d250ca464c385e7960ac715b2ae
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jmantysalo):
Replying to [comment:16 dkrenn]:
> Replying to [comment:15 jmantysalo]:
> > If `union()` does same thing as `disjoint_union()` in posets and in
graphs - -
> No, it does not do the same.
OK.
> > It seems unnecessary to have `INPUT`-part at all, if the function has
no arguments at all.
>
> The developer guide says
>
> An INPUT and an OUTPUT block describing the input/output of the
function. This is not optional.
True. But I don't think if it has been thinked that "no input" must be
documented. Is it in other places? Or should this part of developer guide
be changed?
And should for example docstring of `.cardinality()` really contain
`OUTPUT`-block saying that output type is sage's `Integer`?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17693#comment:18>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
