#18534: Posets: Adding function from categories to index of functions
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jmantysalo | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-6.8
Component: documentation | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jori Mäntysalo | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jmantysalo/posets__adding_function_from_categories_to_index_of_functions|
b31c216bae73e63b9066778e2a3d569536ca91d2
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by kdilks):
I finally have a chance to start reviewing things again.
Is there any chance you could look up the justification for keeping some
poset functions in {{{posets.py}}} and some in {{{categories}}}? Because I
agree that unifying them would be the better solution.
Also, why does the index of functions not make any reference to other
modules that it may be inheriting functions from? Even if we can expect
that (for example) a user will know that every lattice is a poset, the
documentation should directly provide a link from the index of functions
for Lattices to the index of functions for Posets, rather than forcing
them to manually find the relevant page.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18534#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
