#18534: Posets: Adding function from categories to index of functions
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jmantysalo | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-6.8
Component: documentation | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jori Mäntysalo | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jmantysalo/posets__adding_function_from_categories_to_index_of_functions|
b31c216bae73e63b9066778e2a3d569536ca91d2
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jmantysalo):
Replying to [comment:11 ncohen]:
> Well. You say that nobody rejected it, but I am personally against the
changes from two of those tickets. You are only right in the sense that I
don't believe that 'not agreeing' is sufficient to 'reject it'.
>
> By the way, you should really stop with those two-lines tickets and
merge those superficial changes into something else (if you find somebody
who agrees with it).
Already lowering ticket counter with #19023.
I think that the point of this ticket is not about those two lines. It is
the discussion about how to enhance documentation of the software.
I would say "reject" to leaving things as they are. This patch is my
suggestion one. Suggestion two is to add index to category of posets, add
index to category of finite posets, and link them at the beginning of
index of finite posets. Suggestion three is to make a new page that
contains index of poset functions and a short introduction to posets in
Sage. All these suggestions assumes that the code itself will not be
refactored.
(You may mean that I should stop doing tickets like #18925. If that is the
case, I must say that it is hard. To get unified interface it is needed to
sometimes go throught a bigger part of Sage. OTOH if I make a big but
simple patch of doctrings, it will take a year to write, will needs
rebasing ten times, and may never get positive_review.)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18534#comment:12>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
