#18987: Parallel computation for TilingSolver.number_of_solutions
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
slabbe | Status: needs_work
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.9
enhancement | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: | Reviewers: Vincent Delecroix
combinatorics | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: | b370fd04a3efb7393d5516936958c552934faa7f
Sébastien Labbé | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
u/slabbe/18987 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by slabbe):
> I am not sure the overall strategy is the good one. If parallelization
is needed I guess that it should better be implemented at the level of
dancing links. Googling "parallelization dancing links" already gives a
lot of things.
If you agree, I suggest to move the discussion of "parallelization dancing
links" in another ticket for which I am willing to be a reviewer.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18987#comment:14>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
