#18586: passing on parameters and extra_category for cartesian products
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  dkrenn             |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_info
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.9
      Component:  categories         |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  sd67               |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Daniel Krenn       |    Reviewers:  Vincent Delecroix
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:  u/dkrenn/cat       |       Commit:
  /extra-category                    |  ba5dab93e6c7b33eeefc0c937dd2a7d11098807a
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by vdelecroix):

 Replying to [comment:5 dkrenn]:
 > Replying to [comment:3 vdelecroix]:
 > > But what is the point of the ignored `flatten` argument and the
 forbidden `kwargs` in `cartesian_product.py`??
 >
 > It was already there before...I think the idea is that at some point in
 future, a cartesian product of cartesian products can be flattened, so
 that this results in a non-nested form of the cartesian product.

 Would it hurt to remove it? What about the `kwargs` that you added?

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18586#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to