#18972: twographs and Seidel switching
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: dimpase | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.9
Component: graph theory | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/dimpase/seidelsw | 799a2bf3bea99309b02eb11cc5438e428135be0c
Dependencies: #18960, #18948, | Stopgaps:
#18988, #18991, #18986, #19018, |
#19019 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
> OK, this is a good argument. Perhaps it's better to move it to
strongly_regular_db,
> where it is used, than to twographs?
That's up to you. I believe that it makes more sense to define it in the
twograph module, cause that's where I would personally look for anything
related to twographs. Plus this descendant, unless I make a mistake, is
not directly linked to SRGs. But well, that's up to you: move it where you
prefer.
> IMHO there are more important things than speeding this function up, but
do as you like.
I will update that code, it takes two lines at most. I only wish Volker
would release another beta, for it is hard to see what is added by that
branch and what belongs to its dependencies.
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18972#comment:71>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
