#18547: Improve polynomial powering in positive characteristic
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: bruno | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.9
Component: commutative | Resolution:
algebra | Merged in:
Keywords: polynomial, | Reviewers:
powering | Work issues:
Authors: Bruno Grenet | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | 959947d37b22e0c806e5e2034760abdc10d967b6
Branch: | Stopgaps:
u/bruno/polynomial_powering_positive_characteristic|
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jdemeyer):
And I'm not too happy with this either:
{{{
self.base_ring().is_field()
}}}
Checking whether some complicated ring is a field might be an expensive
operation. I prefer
{{{
self.base_ring() in IntegralDomains
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18547#comment:20>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
